Previous Page  138 / 352 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 138 / 352 Next Page
Page Background

6. PROVENANCE OF THE HP-HT UPPER ALLOCHTHON

122

grade metamorphic events (see the horizontal trend

of this population in Fig. 8). There is also a small

data set with crystallization ages of

c.

3.0 Ga (

e

Hf

(

t

)

from

c.

+

2.2 to 4.8) pointing to a similar geologi-

cal framework, an intrusion at

c.

3.0 Ga and a

reworking process (data with average

T

DM

of

3.5 Ga). In the Northern WAC, Archean igneous

rocks have mainly been reported in the Western

Reguibat Rise. The different terranes in this rise

contain zircon crystallization ages of

c.

3.50

3.45,

3.04

2.92, 2.75

2.70 and 2.50

2.46 Ga (Potrel

et al.

,

1996, 1998; Key

et al.

, 2008; Schofield

et al.

, 2012;

Bea

et al.

, 2013; Montero

et al.

, 2014). These studies

suggest that the Western part of the Reguibat Rise

is a viable candidate for the provenance of the

Banded Gneisses Archean zircon (despite the

c.

3.5 Ga population, which is only found in the

Banded Gneisses as T

DM

in some zircon).

The Banded Gneisses Paleoproterozoic fraction

makes up 39.6% of the total population (Fig. 5).

Maximum abundance clusters at

c.

2.14

1.88 Ga

with a maximum peak at 2.07 Ga (Fig. 4). This Pale-

oproterozoic population falls within the time span of

the Eburnean orogeny (2.2

2.0 Ga according to Egal

et al.

, 2002; or 2.2

1.8 Ga according to Ennih &

Liegeois, 2008), so the Paleoproterozoic materials of

the Banded Gneisses are possibly derived from rocks

generated or reworked during the Eburnean orogeny.

Eburnean ages between

c.

2.1 and 2.04 Ga in igneous

and sedimentary rocks have been reported in the

Eastern Reguibat Rise (Peucat

et al.

, 2005; Schofield

et al.

, 2006) and in the Anti-Atlas belt (Thomas

et al.

, 2002; Abati

et al.

, 2012; Avigad

et al.

, 2012),

supporting a WAC provenance for the Banded

Gneisses Paleoproterozoic zircon. The Banded

Gneisses Lu

Hf data (Fig. 7a) for zircon of

Eburnean age (

c.

2.20

1.88 Ga,

n

=

135) are

arranged as a cluster with positive

e

Hf

(

t

)

values

(

n

=

96/135) representing juvenile rocks (average

T

DM

of

c.

2.2 Ga) and few negative

e

Hf

(

t

)

values

(

n

=

39/135), suggesting a mixing process, i.e. Ebur-

nean DM derived magmas intruding an older crust

triggering mixing processes (Fig. 8). As the most neg-

ative

e

Hf

(

t

)

value for Eburnean zircon is 18, and the

Archean linear arrangement intersects at

c.

2 Ga at

~

e

Hf

(

t

)

=

17, this old crust could well be the one

represented by the Banded Gneisses Archean zircon.

All these observations are in agreement with the geo-

dynamic setting proposed by Egal

et al.

(2002), where

the Eburnean is an active margin orogen formed by

oceanic subduction along the edge of the pre-existing

Archean craton.

In the Mesoproterozoic Era, the WAC became a

stable craton (Ennih & Liegeois, 2008) which

resulted in a characteristic

c.

1.7

1.0 Ga ‘magmatic

gap’ (Linnemann

et al.

, 2008 and references

therein). Nevertheless, in some peripheral WAC

derived samples, Mesoproterozoic zircon is relatively

common in Ediacaran

Ordovician (and younger)

siliciclastic samples (Anti-Atlas, Avigad

et al.

, 2012;

Autochthon, Fernandez-Suarez

et al.

, 2013; Parau-

tochthon, Dıez Fernandez

et al.

, 2012c; Basal

allochthonous units, Dıez Fernandez

et al.

, 2010).

In the Banded Gneisses the Mesoproterozoic zircon

is scarce and scattered, constituting 2.8% of the

total population and not defining a clear maximum

(Fig. 4). Taking into account its juvenile character

(

e

Hf

(

t

)

from

+

6.5 to 5.5), this population could

have been derived from the Amazonia craton or

from Mesoproterozoic dykes intruding the WAC.

Terranes that clearly derive from the Amazonian

craton and have similar Neoproterozoic

Cambrian

arc developments as the Upper Allochthon (Avalo-

nia and Ganderia), contain juvenile Mesoproterozoic

zircon (Willner

et al.

, 2013, 2014; Fig. 10), but not

as juvenile as zircon from this study (Figs 7a & 10).

Dolerite dykes have been recently discovered in the

Anti-Atlas belt with emplacement ages of

c.

1.65 Ga (Kouyate

et al.

, 2013) and

c.

1.4 Ga (El

Bahat

et al.

, 2013; Michard & Gasquet, 2013;

S

oderlund

et al.

, 2013). The

176

Hf/

177

Hf

v.

age plot

(Fig. 8) shows that the HP

HT Upper Allochthon

Mesoproterozoic population seems to have a source

that undertook a similar Lu/Hf isotopic evolution

as the CHUR-depleted mantle (with a similar

176

Lu/

177

Hf ratio of

~

0.033

0.038). These observa-

tions seem to favour a WAC juvenile dyke prove-

nance rather than an Amazonian or even a

Laurentian source. Therefore, the provenance of the

Mesoproterozoic population remains enigmatic (be-

cause the observations aforementioned are not con-

clusive), but it does not seem necessary to assign

far exotic provenance sources to explain the pres-

ence of this small population in the Upper Alloch-

thon.

The proximal (

<

1 Ga) detrital zircon spectrum

The Palaeozoic

Neoproterozoic fraction constitutes

34.7% of the Banded Gneisses zircon, most with ages

of

c.

780

490 Ma and with a maximum abundance at

c.

522

512 Ma. These ages coincide with the reported

ages for the Cadomian orogeny (

c.

750

540 Ma; Lin-

nemann

et al.

, 2014), but the

c.

522

512 Ma Banded

Gneisses maximum is younger, suggesting a different

metacratonic WAC activity or, more likely, a late

development of the Cadomian orogeny. Palaeozoic

Neoproterozoic populations in the WAC are very

common, and range from

c.

770 to 530 Ma (Anti-At-

las belt, Thomas

et al.

, 2002; Abati

et al.

, 2012; Avi-

gad

et al.

, 2012). The Ganderia and Avalonia

terranes are characterized by a

c.

700

500 Ma devel-

opment of magmatic arcs that were built on the

Amazonian craton sector of the Gondwanan margin

(Willner

et al.

, 2013, 2014; Fig. 10). Banded Gneisses

zircon with ages between

c.

780 and 590 Ma are not

abundant and fall in the Lu

Hf diagram (Fig. 7a,b)

around the CHUR evolution trend (

e

Hf

(

t

)

from

+

4 to

©

2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

972

R. ALBERT

ET AL.