332 / 352
207
Pb
a
U
b
Pb
b
Th
b 206
Pbc
c 207
Pb
d
±2
V
206
Pb
d
±2
V
ȡ
e 207
Pb
d
±2
V
206
Pb
f
±2
V
207
Pb
f
±2
V
207
Pb
f
±2
V
Conc.
g
(cps) (ppm) (ppm)
U (%)
235
U (%)
238
U (%) (rho)
206
Pb (%)
238
U (Ma)
235
U (Ma)
206
Pb (Ma) (%)
Grain
91500
h
7004 61 11 0.25 0.4 0.1794 2.1 1.8382 3.2 0.07 1.5934 0.6 1063 20 1059 21 1050 32 101
Felix
h
6572 361 52 2.08 0.4 0.0810 3.3 0.6372 3.3 0.06 2.2877 0.5 502 16 501 13 492 50 102
Plesovice
h
2310 955 49 0.08 0.1 0.0542 1.5 0.4000 1.6 0.05 1.3002 0.5 340 5 342 5 351 29 97
GJ-1
h
6697 306 28 0.03 0.2 0.0983 1.3 0.8144 2.1 0.06 2.1705 0.5 604 7 605 10
206
Pb/
238
U error is the quadratic additions of the within run precision (2 SE) and the external reproducibility (2 SD) of the
reference zircon.
207
Pb/
206
Pb error propagation (
207
Pb signal dependent) following Gerdes & Zeh (2009).
207
Pb/
235
U error is the
quadratic addition of the
207
Pb/
206
Pb and
206
Pb/
238
U uncertainty.
a
Within run background-corrected mean
207
Pb signal in cps (counts per second).
b
U and Pb content and Th/U ratio were calculated relative to GJ-1 reference zircon.
c
Percentage of the common Pb on the
206
Pb. b.d. = below detection limit.
d
Pb/U and Pb/Pb ratios. Corrected for background, within-run Pb/U fractionation (in case of
206
Pb/
238
U) and common Pb using
Stacy and Kramers (1975) model Pb composition and subsequently normalised to GJ-1 (ID-TIMS value/measured value);
207
Pb/
235
U calculated using ((
207
Pb/
206
Pb)*(
238
U/
206
Pb)*137.88).
e
ZŚŽ ;ʌͿ ŝƐ ƚŚĞ ;
206
Pb/
238
U)/(
207
Pb/
235
U) error correlation coefficient.
f
Pb/U and Pb/Pb ages.
g
Degree of concordance = ((
206
Pb/
238
U age)/(
207
Pb/
206
Pb age)) x 100.
h
Mean of 13 (91500), 13 (Felix), 13 (Plesovice), and 26(GJ-1) analyses, respectively.
316